Nesquik Chocolate Lowfat Milk vs Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Nesquik Chocolate Lowfat Milk
Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Nesquik Chocolate Lowfat Milk and Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Nesquik Chocolate Lowfat Milk is the clear winner. With 226 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Nesquik Chocolate Lowfat Milk takes the lead with only 8.9g of sugar per 100g, whereas Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green contains 85.714285714286g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Nesquik Chocolate Lowfat Milk offers a protein boost with 3.39g per 100g, outperforming Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Nesquik Chocolate Lowfat Milk or Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green?
Nesquik Chocolate Lowfat Milk appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Nesquik Chocolate Lowfat Milk vegan?
No, Nesquik Chocolate Lowfat Milk is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Nesquik Chocolate Lowfat Milk and Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green?
There is a difference of 226 calories per 100g between the two products.
