New england style condensed clam chowder vs Wild Albacore Tuna
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
New england style condensed clam chowder
Wild Albacore Tuna
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing New england style condensed clam chowder and Wild Albacore Tuna side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, New england style condensed clam chowder is the clear winner. With 34 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. New england style condensed clam chowder contains significantly more sugar (1.23g) compared to the milder Wild Albacore Tuna (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Wild Albacore Tuna is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: New england style condensed clam chowder or Wild Albacore Tuna?
It depends on your goals. New england style condensed clam chowder has 93 calories, while Wild Albacore Tuna has 127 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is New england style condensed clam chowder vegan?
No, New england style condensed clam chowder is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between New england style condensed clam chowder and Wild Albacore Tuna?
There is a difference of 34 calories per 100g between the two products.
