Head-to-Head Analysis

Newtons Soft & Chewy Strawberry vs Flapjack Power Cup Chocolate Chip & Maple

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Newtons Soft & Chewy Strawberry

Newtons Soft & Chewy Strawberry

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Flapjack Power Cup Chocolate Chip & Maple

Flapjack Power Cup Chocolate Chip & Maple

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
1190 kcal
Energy
400 kcal
143g
Sugars
24.6g
17.8g
Fat
10.8g
11.9g
Protein
18.5g
2.8g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Newtons Soft & Chewy Strawberry and Flapjack Power Cup Chocolate Chip & Maple side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Newtons Soft & Chewy Strawberry is the more energy-dense option here, packing 790 more calories per 100g than Flapjack Power Cup Chocolate Chip & Maple. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Newtons Soft & Chewy Strawberry contains significantly more sugar (143g) compared to the milder Flapjack Power Cup Chocolate Chip & Maple (24.6g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Flapjack Power Cup Chocolate Chip & Maple is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Newtons Soft & Chewy Strawberry or Flapjack Power Cup Chocolate Chip & Maple?

It depends on your goals. Newtons Soft & Chewy Strawberry has 1190 calories, while Flapjack Power Cup Chocolate Chip & Maple has 400 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Newtons Soft & Chewy Strawberry vegan?

No, Newtons Soft & Chewy Strawberry is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Newtons Soft & Chewy Strawberry and Flapjack Power Cup Chocolate Chip & Maple?

There is a difference of 790 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.