Head-to-Head Analysis

No Sugar Added Cinnamon Apple Granola vs MUFFIN BARS CHOCOLATE CHIP

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of No Sugar Added Cinnamon Apple Granola

No Sugar Added Cinnamon Apple Granola

Not Vegan
VS
Package of MUFFIN BARS CHOCOLATE CHIP

MUFFIN BARS CHOCOLATE CHIP

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
492 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
14.8g
Sugars
25.6g
23g
Fat
19.9g
8.2g
Protein
5.7g
0.7g
Salt
3.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing No Sugar Added Cinnamon Apple Granola and MUFFIN BARS CHOCOLATE CHIP side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

No Sugar Added Cinnamon Apple Granola is the more energy-dense option here, packing 492 more calories per 100g than MUFFIN BARS CHOCOLATE CHIP. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, No Sugar Added Cinnamon Apple Granola takes the lead with only 14.8g of sugar per 100g, whereas MUFFIN BARS CHOCOLATE CHIP contains 25.6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? No Sugar Added Cinnamon Apple Granola offers a protein boost with 8.2g per 100g, outperforming MUFFIN BARS CHOCOLATE CHIP in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: No Sugar Added Cinnamon Apple Granola or MUFFIN BARS CHOCOLATE CHIP?

It depends on your goals. No Sugar Added Cinnamon Apple Granola has 492 calories, while MUFFIN BARS CHOCOLATE CHIP has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is No Sugar Added Cinnamon Apple Granola vegan?

No, No Sugar Added Cinnamon Apple Granola is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between No Sugar Added Cinnamon Apple Granola and MUFFIN BARS CHOCOLATE CHIP?

There is a difference of 492 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.