Head-to-Head Analysis

No sugar added cranberry concord grape juice vs Dry Roasted Unsalted Peanuts

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of No sugar added cranberry concord grape juice

No sugar added cranberry concord grape juice

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Dry Roasted Unsalted Peanuts

Dry Roasted Unsalted Peanuts

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
54.2 kcal
Energy
571.4 kcal
13.8g
Sugars
3.6g
0g
Fat
50g
0g
Protein
25g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing No sugar added cranberry concord grape juice and Dry Roasted Unsalted Peanuts side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, No sugar added cranberry concord grape juice is the clear winner. With 517 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. No sugar added cranberry concord grape juice contains significantly more sugar (13.75g) compared to the milder Dry Roasted Unsalted Peanuts (3.5714285714286g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Dry Roasted Unsalted Peanuts is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: No sugar added cranberry concord grape juice or Dry Roasted Unsalted Peanuts?

It depends on your goals. No sugar added cranberry concord grape juice has 54.17 calories, while Dry Roasted Unsalted Peanuts has 571.42857142857 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is No sugar added cranberry concord grape juice vegan?

No, No sugar added cranberry concord grape juice is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between No sugar added cranberry concord grape juice and Dry Roasted Unsalted Peanuts?

There is a difference of 517 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.