Head-to-Head Analysis

No Sugar Or Salt Added Almond Butter Creamy vs Natural blueberries

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of No Sugar Or Salt Added Almond Butter Creamy

No Sugar Or Salt Added Almond Butter Creamy

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Natural blueberries

Natural blueberries

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
625 kcal
Energy
58.1 kcal
6.3g
Sugars
9g
53.1g
Fat
0.6g
21.9g
Protein
0.6g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing No Sugar Or Salt Added Almond Butter Creamy and Natural blueberries side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

No Sugar Or Salt Added Almond Butter Creamy is the more energy-dense option here, packing 567 more calories per 100g than Natural blueberries. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, No Sugar Or Salt Added Almond Butter Creamy takes the lead with only 6.25g of sugar per 100g, whereas Natural blueberries contains 9.03g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? No Sugar Or Salt Added Almond Butter Creamy offers a protein boost with 21.9g per 100g, outperforming Natural blueberries in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: No Sugar Or Salt Added Almond Butter Creamy or Natural blueberries?

It depends on your goals. No Sugar Or Salt Added Almond Butter Creamy has 625 calories, while Natural blueberries has 58.1 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is No Sugar Or Salt Added Almond Butter Creamy vegan?

No, No Sugar Or Salt Added Almond Butter Creamy is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between No Sugar Or Salt Added Almond Butter Creamy and Natural blueberries?

There is a difference of 567 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.