Nom’s Ube Cookies vs Sweet Fish
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Nom’s Ube Cookies
Sweet Fish
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Nom’s Ube Cookies and Sweet Fish side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Nom’s Ube Cookies is the more energy-dense option here, packing 204 more calories per 100g than Sweet Fish. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Nom’s Ube Cookies contains significantly more sugar (50g) compared to the milder Sweet Fish (6g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sweet Fish is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Nom’s Ube Cookies offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming Sweet Fish in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Nom’s Ube Cookies or Sweet Fish?
It depends on your goals. Nom’s Ube Cookies has 464 calories, while Sweet Fish has 260 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Nom’s Ube Cookies vegan?
No, Nom’s Ube Cookies is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Nom’s Ube Cookies and Sweet Fish?
There is a difference of 204 calories per 100g between the two products.
