Head-to-Head Analysis

North Sea Chopped Herrings vs Wild Alaskan Black Cod Sablefish with a Miso Marinade

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of North Sea Chopped Herrings

North Sea Chopped Herrings

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wild Alaskan Black Cod Sablefish with a Miso Marinade

Wild Alaskan Black Cod Sablefish with a Miso Marinade

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
202 kcal
Energy
338 kcal
13.3g
Sugars
5.6g
12.5g
Fat
26.8g
6.5g
Protein
14.1g
1.9g
Salt
52.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing North Sea Chopped Herrings and Wild Alaskan Black Cod Sablefish with a Miso Marinade side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, North Sea Chopped Herrings is the clear winner. With 136 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. North Sea Chopped Herrings contains significantly more sugar (13.3g) compared to the milder Wild Alaskan Black Cod Sablefish with a Miso Marinade (5.63g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Wild Alaskan Black Cod Sablefish with a Miso Marinade is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: North Sea Chopped Herrings or Wild Alaskan Black Cod Sablefish with a Miso Marinade?

It depends on your goals. North Sea Chopped Herrings has 202 calories, while Wild Alaskan Black Cod Sablefish with a Miso Marinade has 338 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is North Sea Chopped Herrings vegan?

No, North Sea Chopped Herrings is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between North Sea Chopped Herrings and Wild Alaskan Black Cod Sablefish with a Miso Marinade?

There is a difference of 136 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.