Head-to-Head Analysis

NOS vs Drinking chocolate 65% golden dark

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of NOS

NOS

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Drinking chocolate 65% golden dark

Drinking chocolate 65% golden dark

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
47.1 kcal
Energy
600 kcal
11.2g
Sugars
15g
0g
Fat
45g
0g
Protein
10g
0.2g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing NOS and Drinking chocolate 65% golden dark side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, NOS is the clear winner. With 553 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, NOS takes the lead with only 11.176470588235g of sugar per 100g, whereas Drinking chocolate 65% golden dark contains 15g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: NOS or Drinking chocolate 65% golden dark?

NOS appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is NOS vegan?

No, NOS is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between NOS and Drinking chocolate 65% golden dark?

There is a difference of 553 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.