Head-to-Head Analysis

Oakwood Smoked Scottish Salmon vs Squash & Sweet Peas Baby Food Puree

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Oakwood Smoked Scottish Salmon

Oakwood Smoked Scottish Salmon

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Squash & Sweet Peas Baby Food Puree

Squash & Sweet Peas Baby Food Puree

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
158 kcal
Energy
49 kcal
0g
Sugars
2g
7.9g
Fat
0g
22.8g
Protein
1g
4g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Oakwood Smoked Scottish Salmon and Squash & Sweet Peas Baby Food Puree side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Oakwood Smoked Scottish Salmon is the more energy-dense option here, packing 109 more calories per 100g than Squash & Sweet Peas Baby Food Puree. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Oakwood Smoked Scottish Salmon takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Squash & Sweet Peas Baby Food Puree contains 2.04g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Oakwood Smoked Scottish Salmon offers a protein boost with 22.8g per 100g, outperforming Squash & Sweet Peas Baby Food Puree in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Oakwood Smoked Scottish Salmon or Squash & Sweet Peas Baby Food Puree?

It depends on your goals. Oakwood Smoked Scottish Salmon has 158 calories, while Squash & Sweet Peas Baby Food Puree has 49 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Oakwood Smoked Scottish Salmon vegan?

No, Oakwood Smoked Scottish Salmon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Oakwood Smoked Scottish Salmon and Squash & Sweet Peas Baby Food Puree?

There is a difference of 109 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.