Oikos Fusion Muscle + Digestive Health Support vs Trident gum, watermelon twist, sugar free
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Oikos Fusion Muscle + Digestive Health Support

Trident gum, watermelon twist, sugar free
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Oikos Fusion Muscle + Digestive Health Support and Trident gum, watermelon twist, sugar free side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Oikos Fusion Muscle + Digestive Health Support is the clear winner. With 228 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Oikos Fusion Muscle + Digestive Health Support contains significantly more sugar (2.02g) compared to the milder Trident gum, watermelon twist, sugar free (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Trident gum, watermelon twist, sugar free is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Oikos Fusion Muscle + Digestive Health Support offers a protein boost with 11.6g per 100g, outperforming Trident gum, watermelon twist, sugar free in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Oikos Fusion Muscle + Digestive Health Support or Trident gum, watermelon twist, sugar free?
It depends on your goals. Oikos Fusion Muscle + Digestive Health Support has 65.5 calories, while Trident gum, watermelon twist, sugar free has 294 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Oikos Fusion Muscle + Digestive Health Support vegan?
No, Oikos Fusion Muscle + Digestive Health Support is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Oikos Fusion Muscle + Digestive Health Support and Trident gum, watermelon twist, sugar free?
There is a difference of 228 calories per 100g between the two products.




