Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count vs Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count
Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count and Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count is the more energy-dense option here, packing 86 more calories per 100g than Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry contains 22.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count or Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry?
It depends on your goals. Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count has 486 calories, while Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry has 400 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count vegan?
No, Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count and Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry?
There is a difference of 86 calories per 100g between the two products.
