Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa vs The Original Coffeemate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa

Organic Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of The Original Coffeemate

The Original Coffeemate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
559 kcal
Energy
90.9 kcal
52.9g
Sugars
0g
32.4g
Fat
9.1g
8.8g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa and The Original Coffeemate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Organic Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa is the more energy-dense option here, packing 468 more calories per 100g than The Original Coffeemate. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa contains significantly more sugar (52.94g) compared to the milder The Original Coffeemate (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, The Original Coffeemate is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Organic Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa offers a protein boost with 8.82g per 100g, outperforming The Original Coffeemate in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa or The Original Coffeemate?

It depends on your goals. Organic Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa has 559 calories, while The Original Coffeemate has 90.9 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa vegan?

No, Organic Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa and The Original Coffeemate?

There is a difference of 468 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.