Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Medjool Dates vs Mott's Fruit Flavored Snacks Apple Orchard

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic Medjool Dates

Organic Medjool Dates

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mott's Fruit Flavored Snacks Apple Orchard

Mott's Fruit Flavored Snacks Apple Orchard

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
275 kcal
Energy
348 kcal
67.5g
Sugars
39.1g
0g
Fat
0g
2.5g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Medjool Dates and Mott's Fruit Flavored Snacks Apple Orchard side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Organic Medjool Dates is the clear winner. With 73 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic Medjool Dates contains significantly more sugar (67.5g) compared to the milder Mott's Fruit Flavored Snacks Apple Orchard (39.1g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Mott's Fruit Flavored Snacks Apple Orchard is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Organic Medjool Dates offers a protein boost with 2.5g per 100g, outperforming Mott's Fruit Flavored Snacks Apple Orchard in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Medjool Dates or Mott's Fruit Flavored Snacks Apple Orchard?

It depends on your goals. Organic Medjool Dates has 275 calories, while Mott's Fruit Flavored Snacks Apple Orchard has 348 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Medjool Dates vegan?

No, Organic Medjool Dates is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Medjool Dates and Mott's Fruit Flavored Snacks Apple Orchard?

There is a difference of 73 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.