Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Oatmeal Classic with Flax & Chia imp vs Crushed Tomatoes

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Organic Oatmeal Classic with Flax & Chia imp

Organic Oatmeal Classic with Flax & Chia imp

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Crushed Tomatoes

Crushed Tomatoes

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
392 kcal
Energy
32.8 kcal
2g
Sugars
3.3g
8.8g
Fat
0g
13.7g
Protein
1.6g
0.7g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Oatmeal Classic with Flax & Chia imp and Crushed Tomatoes side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Organic Oatmeal Classic with Flax & Chia imp is the more energy-dense option here, packing 359 more calories per 100g than Crushed Tomatoes. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Organic Oatmeal Classic with Flax & Chia imp takes the lead with only 1.96g of sugar per 100g, whereas Crushed Tomatoes contains 3.28g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Organic Oatmeal Classic with Flax & Chia imp offers a protein boost with 13.73g per 100g, outperforming Crushed Tomatoes in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Oatmeal Classic with Flax & Chia imp or Crushed Tomatoes?

It depends on your goals. Organic Oatmeal Classic with Flax & Chia imp has 392 calories, while Crushed Tomatoes has 32.8 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Oatmeal Classic with Flax & Chia imp vegan?

No, Organic Oatmeal Classic with Flax & Chia imp is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Oatmeal Classic with Flax & Chia imp and Crushed Tomatoes?

There is a difference of 359 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.