Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Reduced Fat Milk vs M&M's Milk Chocolate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Organic Reduced Fat Milk

Organic Reduced Fat Milk

Not Vegan
VS
Package of M&M's Milk Chocolate

M&M's Milk Chocolate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
130 kcal
Energy
480 kcal
11g
Sugars
64.7g
5g
Fat
18.8g
8g
Protein
4.2g
0.3g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Reduced Fat Milk and M&M's Milk Chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Organic Reduced Fat Milk is the clear winner. With 350 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Organic Reduced Fat Milk takes the lead with only 11g of sugar per 100g, whereas M&M's Milk Chocolate contains 64.7g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Organic Reduced Fat Milk offers a protein boost with 8g per 100g, outperforming M&M's Milk Chocolate in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Reduced Fat Milk or M&M's Milk Chocolate?

Organic Reduced Fat Milk appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Organic Reduced Fat Milk vegan?

No, Organic Reduced Fat Milk is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Reduced Fat Milk and M&M's Milk Chocolate?

There is a difference of 350 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.