Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic rice cakes blueberry beets vs Organic Instant Oatmeal Variety Pack

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic rice cakes blueberry beets

Organic rice cakes blueberry beets

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Instant Oatmeal Variety Pack

Organic Instant Oatmeal Variety Pack

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
333.3 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
16.7g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic rice cakes blueberry beets and Organic Instant Oatmeal Variety Pack side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Organic rice cakes blueberry beets is the more energy-dense option here, packing 333 more calories per 100g than Organic Instant Oatmeal Variety Pack. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic rice cakes blueberry beets contains significantly more sugar (16.666666666667g) compared to the milder Organic Instant Oatmeal Variety Pack (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Instant Oatmeal Variety Pack is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic rice cakes blueberry beets or Organic Instant Oatmeal Variety Pack?

It depends on your goals. Organic rice cakes blueberry beets has 333.33333333333 calories, while Organic Instant Oatmeal Variety Pack has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic rice cakes blueberry beets vegan?

No, Organic rice cakes blueberry beets is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic rice cakes blueberry beets and Organic Instant Oatmeal Variety Pack?

There is a difference of 333 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.