Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Ridge Cut Plantain Chips vs Original Fruit Leathers Raspberry

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Organic Ridge Cut Plantain Chips

Organic Ridge Cut Plantain Chips

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Original Fruit Leathers Raspberry

Original Fruit Leathers Raspberry

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
536 kcal
Energy
321 kcal
0g
Sugars
64.3g
32.1g
Fat
0g
3.6g
Protein
0g
0.5g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Ridge Cut Plantain Chips and Original Fruit Leathers Raspberry side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Organic Ridge Cut Plantain Chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 215 more calories per 100g than Original Fruit Leathers Raspberry. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Organic Ridge Cut Plantain Chips takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Original Fruit Leathers Raspberry contains 64.29g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Organic Ridge Cut Plantain Chips offers a protein boost with 3.57g per 100g, outperforming Original Fruit Leathers Raspberry in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Ridge Cut Plantain Chips or Original Fruit Leathers Raspberry?

It depends on your goals. Organic Ridge Cut Plantain Chips has 536 calories, while Original Fruit Leathers Raspberry has 321 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Ridge Cut Plantain Chips vegan?

No, Organic Ridge Cut Plantain Chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Ridge Cut Plantain Chips and Original Fruit Leathers Raspberry?

There is a difference of 215 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.