Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Toasted Wheat Square Crackers vs Crinkle Cut Sweet Potatoes

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Organic Toasted Wheat Square Crackers

Organic Toasted Wheat Square Crackers

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Crinkle Cut Sweet Potatoes

Crinkle Cut Sweet Potatoes

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
467 kcal
Energy
176 kcal
6.7g
Sugars
8.2g
16.7g
Fat
7.1g
6.7g
Protein
1.2g
2.3g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Toasted Wheat Square Crackers and Crinkle Cut Sweet Potatoes side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Organic Toasted Wheat Square Crackers is the more energy-dense option here, packing 291 more calories per 100g than Crinkle Cut Sweet Potatoes. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Organic Toasted Wheat Square Crackers takes the lead with only 6.67g of sugar per 100g, whereas Crinkle Cut Sweet Potatoes contains 8.23g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Organic Toasted Wheat Square Crackers offers a protein boost with 6.67g per 100g, outperforming Crinkle Cut Sweet Potatoes in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Toasted Wheat Square Crackers or Crinkle Cut Sweet Potatoes?

It depends on your goals. Organic Toasted Wheat Square Crackers has 467 calories, while Crinkle Cut Sweet Potatoes has 176 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Toasted Wheat Square Crackers vegan?

No, Organic Toasted Wheat Square Crackers is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Toasted Wheat Square Crackers and Crinkle Cut Sweet Potatoes?

There is a difference of 291 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.