Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Uncured Black Forest Ham vs Hickory Smoke Flavored Spam

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic Uncured Black Forest Ham

Organic Uncured Black Forest Ham

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Hickory Smoke Flavored Spam

Hickory Smoke Flavored Spam

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
107 kcal
Energy
321.4 kcal
1.8g
Sugars
0g
2.7g
Fat
28.6g
19.6g
Protein
12.5g
1.7g
Salt
2.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Uncured Black Forest Ham and Hickory Smoke Flavored Spam side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Organic Uncured Black Forest Ham is the clear winner. With 214 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic Uncured Black Forest Ham contains significantly more sugar (1.79g) compared to the milder Hickory Smoke Flavored Spam (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Hickory Smoke Flavored Spam is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Organic Uncured Black Forest Ham offers a protein boost with 19.6g per 100g, outperforming Hickory Smoke Flavored Spam in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Uncured Black Forest Ham or Hickory Smoke Flavored Spam?

It depends on your goals. Organic Uncured Black Forest Ham has 107 calories, while Hickory Smoke Flavored Spam has 321.43 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Uncured Black Forest Ham vegan?

No, Organic Uncured Black Forest Ham is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Uncured Black Forest Ham and Hickory Smoke Flavored Spam?

There is a difference of 214 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.