Head-to-Head Analysis

Original Beef Jerky vs Smoked Ham & Cotto Salami Sub Kit

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Original Beef Jerky

Original Beef Jerky

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Smoked Ham & Cotto Salami Sub Kit

Smoked Ham & Cotto Salami Sub Kit

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
333 kcal
Energy
140.4 kcal
23.8g
Sugars
1.8g
4.8g
Fat
7g
38.1g
Protein
14g
4.3g
Salt
3.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Original Beef Jerky and Smoked Ham & Cotto Salami Sub Kit side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Original Beef Jerky is the more energy-dense option here, packing 193 more calories per 100g than Smoked Ham & Cotto Salami Sub Kit. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Original Beef Jerky contains significantly more sugar (23.8g) compared to the milder Smoked Ham & Cotto Salami Sub Kit (1.75g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Smoked Ham & Cotto Salami Sub Kit is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Original Beef Jerky offers a protein boost with 38.1g per 100g, outperforming Smoked Ham & Cotto Salami Sub Kit in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Original Beef Jerky or Smoked Ham & Cotto Salami Sub Kit?

It depends on your goals. Original Beef Jerky has 333 calories, while Smoked Ham & Cotto Salami Sub Kit has 140.35 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Original Beef Jerky vegan?

No, Original Beef Jerky is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Original Beef Jerky and Smoked Ham & Cotto Salami Sub Kit?

There is a difference of 193 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.