ORIGINAL COOKED HAM vs Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
ORIGINAL COOKED HAM
Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing ORIGINAL COOKED HAM and Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, ORIGINAL COOKED HAM is the clear winner. With 119 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, ORIGINAL COOKED HAM takes the lead with only 2.7027027027027g of sugar per 100g, whereas Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil contains 4g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: ORIGINAL COOKED HAM or Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil?
ORIGINAL COOKED HAM appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is ORIGINAL COOKED HAM vegan?
No, ORIGINAL COOKED HAM is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between ORIGINAL COOKED HAM and Slow Roasted Chick'N Thai Basil?
There is a difference of 119 calories per 100g between the two products.
