Head-to-Head Analysis

ORIGINAL HAWAIIAN SWEET ROLLS vs Sea Salt & Vinegar Kettle Cooked Potato Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of ORIGINAL HAWAIIAN SWEET ROLLS

ORIGINAL HAWAIIAN SWEET ROLLS

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sea Salt & Vinegar Kettle Cooked Potato Chips

Sea Salt & Vinegar Kettle Cooked Potato Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
321.4 kcal
Energy
513 kcal
17.9g
Sugars
5.1g
7.1g
Fat
28.2g
7.1g
Protein
7.7g
0.7g
Salt
1.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing ORIGINAL HAWAIIAN SWEET ROLLS and Sea Salt & Vinegar Kettle Cooked Potato Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, ORIGINAL HAWAIIAN SWEET ROLLS is the clear winner. With 192 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. ORIGINAL HAWAIIAN SWEET ROLLS contains significantly more sugar (17.857142857143g) compared to the milder Sea Salt & Vinegar Kettle Cooked Potato Chips (5.13g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sea Salt & Vinegar Kettle Cooked Potato Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: ORIGINAL HAWAIIAN SWEET ROLLS or Sea Salt & Vinegar Kettle Cooked Potato Chips?

It depends on your goals. ORIGINAL HAWAIIAN SWEET ROLLS has 321.42857142857 calories, while Sea Salt & Vinegar Kettle Cooked Potato Chips has 513 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is ORIGINAL HAWAIIAN SWEET ROLLS vegan?

No, ORIGINAL HAWAIIAN SWEET ROLLS is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between ORIGINAL HAWAIIAN SWEET ROLLS and Sea Salt & Vinegar Kettle Cooked Potato Chips?

There is a difference of 192 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.