Head-to-Head Analysis

Original Recipe Fish Sandwich Fillets vs Unsalted Whipped Butter

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Original Recipe Fish Sandwich Fillets

Original Recipe Fish Sandwich Fillets

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Unsalted Whipped Butter

Unsalted Whipped Butter

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
235 kcal
Energy
778 kcal
1.2g
Sugars
0g
10.6g
Fat
88.9g
9.4g
Protein
0g
1.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Original Recipe Fish Sandwich Fillets and Unsalted Whipped Butter side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Original Recipe Fish Sandwich Fillets is the clear winner. With 543 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Original Recipe Fish Sandwich Fillets contains significantly more sugar (1.18g) compared to the milder Unsalted Whipped Butter (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Unsalted Whipped Butter is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Original Recipe Fish Sandwich Fillets offers a protein boost with 9.41g per 100g, outperforming Unsalted Whipped Butter in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Original Recipe Fish Sandwich Fillets or Unsalted Whipped Butter?

It depends on your goals. Original Recipe Fish Sandwich Fillets has 235 calories, while Unsalted Whipped Butter has 778 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Original Recipe Fish Sandwich Fillets vegan?

No, Original Recipe Fish Sandwich Fillets is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Original Recipe Fish Sandwich Fillets and Unsalted Whipped Butter?

There is a difference of 543 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.