Head-to-Head Analysis

Original Restaurant Style Chips vs organic vanilla marshmallow creme

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Original Restaurant Style Chips

Original Restaurant Style Chips

Not Vegan
VS
Package of organic vanilla marshmallow creme

organic vanilla marshmallow creme

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
375 kcal
0g
Sugars
75g
25g
Fat
0g
7.1g
Protein
0g
1g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Original Restaurant Style Chips and organic vanilla marshmallow creme side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Original Restaurant Style Chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 125 more calories per 100g than organic vanilla marshmallow creme. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Original Restaurant Style Chips takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas organic vanilla marshmallow creme contains 75g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Original Restaurant Style Chips offers a protein boost with 7.1428571428571g per 100g, outperforming organic vanilla marshmallow creme in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Original Restaurant Style Chips or organic vanilla marshmallow creme?

It depends on your goals. Original Restaurant Style Chips has 500 calories, while organic vanilla marshmallow creme has 375 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Original Restaurant Style Chips vegan?

No, Original Restaurant Style Chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Original Restaurant Style Chips and organic vanilla marshmallow creme?

There is a difference of 125 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.