Ortiz, white tuna in olive oil vs Chilean Atlantic Salmon
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Ortiz, white tuna in olive oil
Chilean Atlantic Salmon
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Ortiz, white tuna in olive oil and Chilean Atlantic Salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Ortiz, white tuna in olive oil is the more energy-dense option here, packing 232 more calories per 100g than Chilean Atlantic Salmon. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
Looking to build muscle? Ortiz, white tuna in olive oil offers a protein boost with 26.8g per 100g, outperforming Chilean Atlantic Salmon in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Ortiz, white tuna in olive oil or Chilean Atlantic Salmon?
It depends on your goals. Ortiz, white tuna in olive oil has 232 calories, while Chilean Atlantic Salmon has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Ortiz, white tuna in olive oil vegan?
No, Ortiz, white tuna in olive oil is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Ortiz, white tuna in olive oil and Chilean Atlantic Salmon?
There is a difference of 232 calories per 100g between the two products.
