Head-to-Head Analysis

Panko vs Tomato paste

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Panko

Panko

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Tomato paste

Tomato paste

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
367 kcal
Energy
100 kcal
3.3g
Sugars
16.7g
0g
Fat
1.7g
13.3g
Protein
3.3g
1.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Panko and Tomato paste side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Panko is the more energy-dense option here, packing 267 more calories per 100g than Tomato paste. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Panko takes the lead with only 3.33g of sugar per 100g, whereas Tomato paste contains 16.7g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Panko offers a protein boost with 13.3g per 100g, outperforming Tomato paste in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Panko or Tomato paste?

It depends on your goals. Panko has 367 calories, while Tomato paste has 100 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Panko vegan?

No, Panko is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Panko and Tomato paste?

There is a difference of 267 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.