Head-to-Head Analysis

Passion Fruit Chocolate Cup vs Organic Sea Salt & Nibs Dark Chocolate Bar 63% Cocoa

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Passion Fruit Chocolate Cup

Passion Fruit Chocolate Cup

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Sea Salt & Nibs Dark Chocolate Bar 63% Cocoa

Organic Sea Salt & Nibs Dark Chocolate Bar 63% Cocoa

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
571 kcal
Energy
600 kcal
35.7g
Sugars
32g
42.9g
Fat
40g
7.1g
Protein
8g
0.2g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Passion Fruit Chocolate Cup and Organic Sea Salt & Nibs Dark Chocolate Bar 63% Cocoa side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Passion Fruit Chocolate Cup is the clear winner. With 29 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Passion Fruit Chocolate Cup contains significantly more sugar (35.7g) compared to the milder Organic Sea Salt & Nibs Dark Chocolate Bar 63% Cocoa (32g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Sea Salt & Nibs Dark Chocolate Bar 63% Cocoa is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Passion Fruit Chocolate Cup or Organic Sea Salt & Nibs Dark Chocolate Bar 63% Cocoa?

It depends on your goals. Passion Fruit Chocolate Cup has 571 calories, while Organic Sea Salt & Nibs Dark Chocolate Bar 63% Cocoa has 600 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Passion Fruit Chocolate Cup vegan?

No, Passion Fruit Chocolate Cup is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Passion Fruit Chocolate Cup and Organic Sea Salt & Nibs Dark Chocolate Bar 63% Cocoa?

There is a difference of 29 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.