Head-to-Head Analysis

Peanut butter creme filled cookies vs Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Peanut butter creme filled cookies

Peanut butter creme filled cookies

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green

Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
440 kcal
Energy
285.7 kcal
32g
Sugars
85.7g
18g
Fat
0g
4g
Protein
0g
0.4g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Peanut butter creme filled cookies and Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Peanut butter creme filled cookies is the more energy-dense option here, packing 154 more calories per 100g than Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Peanut butter creme filled cookies takes the lead with only 32g of sugar per 100g, whereas Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green contains 85.714285714286g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Peanut butter creme filled cookies offers a protein boost with 4g per 100g, outperforming Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Peanut butter creme filled cookies or Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green?

It depends on your goals. Peanut butter creme filled cookies has 440 calories, while Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green has 285.71428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Peanut butter creme filled cookies vegan?

No, Peanut butter creme filled cookies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Peanut butter creme filled cookies and Lifesavers Mints Wint O Green?

There is a difference of 154 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.