Head-to-Head Analysis

Peeps Pink Marshmallow Chicks vs Mini Bit Assorted Chocolate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Peeps Pink Marshmallow Chicks

Peeps Pink Marshmallow Chicks

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mini Bit Assorted Chocolate

Mini Bit Assorted Chocolate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
333.3 kcal
Energy
542 kcal
71.4g
Sugars
48.2g
0g
Fat
36.1g
2.4g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Peeps Pink Marshmallow Chicks and Mini Bit Assorted Chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Peeps Pink Marshmallow Chicks is the clear winner. With 209 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Peeps Pink Marshmallow Chicks contains significantly more sugar (71.428571428571g) compared to the milder Mini Bit Assorted Chocolate (48.2g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Mini Bit Assorted Chocolate is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Peeps Pink Marshmallow Chicks offers a protein boost with 2.3809523809524g per 100g, outperforming Mini Bit Assorted Chocolate in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Peeps Pink Marshmallow Chicks or Mini Bit Assorted Chocolate?

It depends on your goals. Peeps Pink Marshmallow Chicks has 333.33333333333 calories, while Mini Bit Assorted Chocolate has 542 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Peeps Pink Marshmallow Chicks vegan?

No, Peeps Pink Marshmallow Chicks is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Peeps Pink Marshmallow Chicks and Mini Bit Assorted Chocolate?

There is a difference of 209 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.