Peter rabit vs Chile 'N Lime Flavored Almonds
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Peter rabit
Chile 'N Lime Flavored Almonds
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Peter rabit and Chile 'N Lime Flavored Almonds side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Peter rabit is the clear winner. With 545 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Peter rabit contains significantly more sugar (10.619469026549g) compared to the milder Chile 'N Lime Flavored Almonds (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chile 'N Lime Flavored Almonds is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Peter rabit or Chile 'N Lime Flavored Almonds?
It depends on your goals. Peter rabit has 61.946902654867 calories, while Chile 'N Lime Flavored Almonds has 607 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Peter rabit vegan?
No, Peter rabit is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Peter rabit and Chile 'N Lime Flavored Almonds?
There is a difference of 545 calories per 100g between the two products.
