Head-to-Head Analysis

Pineapple Chili, Glazed Cod vs Oatmilk - Less Sweet Original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Pineapple Chili, Glazed Cod

Pineapple Chili, Glazed Cod

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Oatmilk - Less Sweet Original

Oatmilk - Less Sweet Original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
97 kcal
Energy
90 kcal
2.7g
Sugars
0g
1.8g
Fat
5g
15.9g
Protein
2g
0.5g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pineapple Chili, Glazed Cod and Oatmilk - Less Sweet Original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Pineapple Chili, Glazed Cod is the more energy-dense option here, packing 7 more calories per 100g than Oatmilk - Less Sweet Original. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Pineapple Chili, Glazed Cod contains significantly more sugar (2.65g) compared to the milder Oatmilk - Less Sweet Original (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Oatmilk - Less Sweet Original is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Pineapple Chili, Glazed Cod offers a protein boost with 15.9g per 100g, outperforming Oatmilk - Less Sweet Original in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pineapple Chili, Glazed Cod or Oatmilk - Less Sweet Original?

It depends on your goals. Pineapple Chili, Glazed Cod has 97 calories, while Oatmilk - Less Sweet Original has 90 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Pineapple Chili, Glazed Cod vegan?

No, Pineapple Chili, Glazed Cod is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pineapple Chili, Glazed Cod and Oatmilk - Less Sweet Original?

There is a difference of 7 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.