Head-to-Head Analysis

Plain Bagles Sliced vs Campbell’s cream of mushroom soup

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Plain Bagles Sliced

Plain Bagles Sliced

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Campbell’s cream of mushroom soup

Campbell’s cream of mushroom soup

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
263.2 kcal
Energy
156.3 kcal
4.2g
Sugars
1.6g
1.6g
Fat
10.9g
8.4g
Protein
3.1g
1.2g
Salt
3.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Plain Bagles Sliced and Campbell’s cream of mushroom soup side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Plain Bagles Sliced is the more energy-dense option here, packing 107 more calories per 100g than Campbell’s cream of mushroom soup. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Plain Bagles Sliced contains significantly more sugar (4.2105263157895g) compared to the milder Campbell’s cream of mushroom soup (1.5625g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Campbell’s cream of mushroom soup is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Plain Bagles Sliced offers a protein boost with 8.4210526315789g per 100g, outperforming Campbell’s cream of mushroom soup in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Plain Bagles Sliced or Campbell’s cream of mushroom soup?

It depends on your goals. Plain Bagles Sliced has 263.15789473684 calories, while Campbell’s cream of mushroom soup has 156.25 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Plain Bagles Sliced vegan?

No, Plain Bagles Sliced is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Plain Bagles Sliced and Campbell’s cream of mushroom soup?

There is a difference of 107 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.