Head-to-Head Analysis

Plant-Based from Italy Carpaccio Style vs CHICKEN NUGGETS

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Plant-Based from Italy Carpaccio Style

Plant-Based from Italy Carpaccio Style

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of CHICKEN NUGGETS

CHICKEN NUGGETS

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
232.1 kcal
Energy
197 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
7.1g
Fat
10.5g
28.6g
Protein
14.5g
4.2g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Plant-Based from Italy Carpaccio Style and CHICKEN NUGGETS side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Plant-Based from Italy Carpaccio Style is the more energy-dense option here, packing 35 more calories per 100g than CHICKEN NUGGETS. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Plant-Based from Italy Carpaccio Style contains significantly more sugar (3.5714285714286g) compared to the milder CHICKEN NUGGETS (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, CHICKEN NUGGETS is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Plant-Based from Italy Carpaccio Style offers a protein boost with 28.571428571429g per 100g, outperforming CHICKEN NUGGETS in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Plant-Based from Italy Carpaccio Style or CHICKEN NUGGETS?

It depends on your goals. Plant-Based from Italy Carpaccio Style has 232.14285714286 calories, while CHICKEN NUGGETS has 197 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Plant-Based from Italy Carpaccio Style vegan?

No, Plant-Based from Italy Carpaccio Style is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Plant-Based from Italy Carpaccio Style and CHICKEN NUGGETS?

There is a difference of 35 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.