Head-to-Head Analysis

Plant Based Ham Style Deli Slices Black Forest vs Center Cut Original Bacon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Plant Based Ham Style Deli Slices Black Forest

Plant Based Ham Style Deli Slices Black Forest

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Center Cut Original Bacon

Center Cut Original Bacon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
134.6 kcal
Energy
462 kcal
3.8g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
34.6g
21.2g
Protein
38.5g
1.2g
Salt
4.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Plant Based Ham Style Deli Slices Black Forest and Center Cut Original Bacon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Plant Based Ham Style Deli Slices Black Forest is the clear winner. With 327 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Plant Based Ham Style Deli Slices Black Forest contains significantly more sugar (3.8461538461538g) compared to the milder Center Cut Original Bacon (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Center Cut Original Bacon is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Plant Based Ham Style Deli Slices Black Forest or Center Cut Original Bacon?

It depends on your goals. Plant Based Ham Style Deli Slices Black Forest has 134.61538461538 calories, while Center Cut Original Bacon has 462 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Plant Based Ham Style Deli Slices Black Forest vegan?

No, Plant Based Ham Style Deli Slices Black Forest is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Plant Based Ham Style Deli Slices Black Forest and Center Cut Original Bacon?

There is a difference of 327 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.