Head-to-Head Analysis

Plums vs Hamburger Helper Beef Pasta Twin Pack

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Plums

Plums

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Hamburger Helper Beef Pasta Twin Pack

Hamburger Helper Beef Pasta Twin Pack

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
96 kcal
Energy
353 kcal
15g
Sugars
2.9g
0g
Fat
1.5g
0g
Protein
11.8g
0g
Salt
4.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Plums and Hamburger Helper Beef Pasta Twin Pack side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Plums is the clear winner. With 257 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Plums contains significantly more sugar (15g) compared to the milder Hamburger Helper Beef Pasta Twin Pack (2.94g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Hamburger Helper Beef Pasta Twin Pack is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Plums or Hamburger Helper Beef Pasta Twin Pack?

It depends on your goals. Plums has 96 calories, while Hamburger Helper Beef Pasta Twin Pack has 353 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Plums vegan?

No, Plums is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Plums and Hamburger Helper Beef Pasta Twin Pack?

There is a difference of 257 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.