Head-to-Head Analysis

Premium Albacore Tuna Wild Caught Solid White vs The Original Organic Premium Roasted Seaweed Snack

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Premium Albacore Tuna Wild Caught Solid White

Premium Albacore Tuna Wild Caught Solid White

Not Vegan
VS
Package of The Original Organic Premium Roasted Seaweed Snack

The Original Organic Premium Roasted Seaweed Snack

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
124 kcal
Energy
300 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
1.3g
Fat
40g
28.3g
Protein
6g
0.7g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Premium Albacore Tuna Wild Caught Solid White and The Original Organic Premium Roasted Seaweed Snack side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Premium Albacore Tuna Wild Caught Solid White is the clear winner. With 176 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Premium Albacore Tuna Wild Caught Solid White offers a protein boost with 28.3g per 100g, outperforming The Original Organic Premium Roasted Seaweed Snack in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Premium Albacore Tuna Wild Caught Solid White or The Original Organic Premium Roasted Seaweed Snack?

It depends on your goals. Premium Albacore Tuna Wild Caught Solid White has 124 calories, while The Original Organic Premium Roasted Seaweed Snack has 300 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Premium Albacore Tuna Wild Caught Solid White vegan?

No, Premium Albacore Tuna Wild Caught Solid White is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Premium Albacore Tuna Wild Caught Solid White and The Original Organic Premium Roasted Seaweed Snack?

There is a difference of 176 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.