Head-to-Head Analysis

Premium original Galletas de Soda vs Kafferep Cookies With Chocolate Flavored Filling

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Premium original Galletas de Soda

Premium original Galletas de Soda

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Kafferep Cookies With Chocolate Flavored Filling

Kafferep Cookies With Chocolate Flavored Filling

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
438 kcal
Energy
481 kcal
0g
Sugars
33.3g
9.4g
Fat
22.2g
6.3g
Protein
3.7g
2.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Premium original Galletas de Soda and Kafferep Cookies With Chocolate Flavored Filling side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Premium original Galletas de Soda is the clear winner. With 43 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Premium original Galletas de Soda takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Kafferep Cookies With Chocolate Flavored Filling contains 33.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Premium original Galletas de Soda offers a protein boost with 6.25g per 100g, outperforming Kafferep Cookies With Chocolate Flavored Filling in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Premium original Galletas de Soda or Kafferep Cookies With Chocolate Flavored Filling?

Premium original Galletas de Soda appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Premium original Galletas de Soda vegan?

No, Premium original Galletas de Soda is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Premium original Galletas de Soda and Kafferep Cookies With Chocolate Flavored Filling?

There is a difference of 43 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.