Head-to-Head Analysis

Pretzel Slims Original vs Original Apple & Strawberry Pure Blended Fruit

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Pretzel Slims Original

Pretzel Slims Original

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Original Apple & Strawberry Pure Blended Fruit

Original Apple & Strawberry Pure Blended Fruit

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
393 kcal
Energy
67 kcal
7.1g
Sugars
15.6g
0g
Fat
0g
7.1g
Protein
0g
2.4g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pretzel Slims Original and Original Apple & Strawberry Pure Blended Fruit side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Pretzel Slims Original is the more energy-dense option here, packing 326 more calories per 100g than Original Apple & Strawberry Pure Blended Fruit. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Pretzel Slims Original takes the lead with only 7.14g of sugar per 100g, whereas Original Apple & Strawberry Pure Blended Fruit contains 15.56g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Pretzel Slims Original offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming Original Apple & Strawberry Pure Blended Fruit in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pretzel Slims Original or Original Apple & Strawberry Pure Blended Fruit?

It depends on your goals. Pretzel Slims Original has 393 calories, while Original Apple & Strawberry Pure Blended Fruit has 67 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Pretzel Slims Original vegan?

No, Pretzel Slims Original is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pretzel Slims Original and Original Apple & Strawberry Pure Blended Fruit?

There is a difference of 326 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.