PRIME Ice Pop Hydration+ Sticks vs Zero Calorie Sucralose sweetener
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
PRIME Ice Pop Hydration+ Sticks
Zero Calorie Sucralose sweetener
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing PRIME Ice Pop Hydration+ Sticks and Zero Calorie Sucralose sweetener side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
PRIME Ice Pop Hydration+ Sticks is the more energy-dense option here, packing 210 more calories per 100g than Zero Calorie Sucralose sweetener. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. PRIME Ice Pop Hydration+ Sticks contains significantly more sugar (21.030494216614g) compared to the milder Zero Calorie Sucralose sweetener (1g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Zero Calorie Sucralose sweetener is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: PRIME Ice Pop Hydration+ Sticks or Zero Calorie Sucralose sweetener?
It depends on your goals. PRIME Ice Pop Hydration+ Sticks has 210.30494216614 calories, while Zero Calorie Sucralose sweetener has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is PRIME Ice Pop Hydration+ Sticks vegan?
No, PRIME Ice Pop Hydration+ Sticks is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between PRIME Ice Pop Hydration+ Sticks and Zero Calorie Sucralose sweetener?
There is a difference of 210 calories per 100g between the two products.
