Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps vs Candy tin pear cnnmn
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps
Candy tin pear cnnmn
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps and Candy tin pear cnnmn side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps is the more energy-dense option here, packing 58 more calories per 100g than Candy tin pear cnnmn. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps takes the lead with only 3.3333333333333g of sugar per 100g, whereas Candy tin pear cnnmn contains 68.8g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps offers a protein boost with 6.6666666666667g per 100g, outperforming Candy tin pear cnnmn in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps or Candy tin pear cnnmn?
It depends on your goals. Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps has 433.33333333333 calories, while Candy tin pear cnnmn has 375 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps vegan?
No, Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Quaker buffalo ranch rice crisps and Candy tin pear cnnmn?
There is a difference of 58 calories per 100g between the two products.
