Head-to-Head Analysis

Quaker grnola bar vs Brach's classic candy corn

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Quaker grnola bar

Quaker grnola bar

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Brach's classic candy corn

Brach's classic candy corn

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
375 kcal
Energy
354.8 kcal
33.3g
Sugars
71g
8.3g
Fat
0g
4.2g
Protein
0g
0.8g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Quaker grnola bar and Brach's classic candy corn side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Quaker grnola bar is the more energy-dense option here, packing 20 more calories per 100g than Brach's classic candy corn. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Quaker grnola bar takes the lead with only 33.3333333333333g of sugar per 100g, whereas Brach's classic candy corn contains 70.9677g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Quaker grnola bar offers a protein boost with 4.16666666666667g per 100g, outperforming Brach's classic candy corn in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Quaker grnola bar or Brach's classic candy corn?

It depends on your goals. Quaker grnola bar has 375 calories, while Brach's classic candy corn has 354.8387 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Quaker grnola bar vegan?

No, Quaker grnola bar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Quaker grnola bar and Brach's classic candy corn?

There is a difference of 20 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.