Head-to-Head Analysis

Quaker grnola bar vs Sweet and Saltynut granola bars

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Quaker grnola bar

Quaker grnola bar

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sweet and Saltynut granola bars

Sweet and Saltynut granola bars

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
375 kcal
Energy
457.1 kcal
33.3g
Sugars
28.6g
8.3g
Fat
22.9g
4.2g
Protein
11.4g
0.8g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Quaker grnola bar and Sweet and Saltynut granola bars side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Quaker grnola bar is the clear winner. With 82 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Quaker grnola bar contains significantly more sugar (33.3333333333333g) compared to the milder Sweet and Saltynut granola bars (28.571428571429g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sweet and Saltynut granola bars is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Quaker grnola bar or Sweet and Saltynut granola bars?

It depends on your goals. Quaker grnola bar has 375 calories, while Sweet and Saltynut granola bars has 457.14285714286 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Quaker grnola bar vegan?

No, Quaker grnola bar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Quaker grnola bar and Sweet and Saltynut granola bars?

There is a difference of 82 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.