Quaker Rice Cakes Buttered Popcorn 4.47 Ounce Plastic Bag vs Toasted Coconut Biscuits w/ Coconut Butter Filling
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Quaker Rice Cakes Buttered Popcorn 4.47 Ounce Plastic Bag

Toasted Coconut Biscuits w/ Coconut Butter Filling
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Quaker Rice Cakes Buttered Popcorn 4.47 Ounce Plastic Bag and Toasted Coconut Biscuits w/ Coconut Butter Filling side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Quaker Rice Cakes Buttered Popcorn 4.47 Ounce Plastic Bag is the clear winner. With 111 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Quaker Rice Cakes Buttered Popcorn 4.47 Ounce Plastic Bag takes the lead with only 1.48g of sugar per 100g, whereas Toasted Coconut Biscuits w/ Coconut Butter Filling contains 26.315789473684g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Quaker Rice Cakes Buttered Popcorn 4.47 Ounce Plastic Bag offers a protein boost with 8.27g per 100g, outperforming Toasted Coconut Biscuits w/ Coconut Butter Filling in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Quaker Rice Cakes Buttered Popcorn 4.47 Ounce Plastic Bag or Toasted Coconut Biscuits w/ Coconut Butter Filling?
Quaker Rice Cakes Buttered Popcorn 4.47 Ounce Plastic Bag appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Quaker Rice Cakes Buttered Popcorn 4.47 Ounce Plastic Bag vegan?
No, Quaker Rice Cakes Buttered Popcorn 4.47 Ounce Plastic Bag is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Quaker Rice Cakes Buttered Popcorn 4.47 Ounce Plastic Bag and Toasted Coconut Biscuits w/ Coconut Butter Filling?
There is a difference of 111 calories per 100g between the two products.




