Head-to-Head Analysis

Ranch Dressing vs Crispy Battered Fish Fillets

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Ranch Dressing

Ranch Dressing

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Crispy Battered Fish Fillets

Crispy Battered Fish Fillets

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
1390 kcal
Energy
223 kcal
11.1g
Sugars
0.9g
144g
Fat
9.8g
0g
Protein
8.9g
0g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ranch Dressing and Crispy Battered Fish Fillets side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Ranch Dressing is the more energy-dense option here, packing 1167 more calories per 100g than Crispy Battered Fish Fillets. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Ranch Dressing contains significantly more sugar (11.1g) compared to the milder Crispy Battered Fish Fillets (0.893g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Crispy Battered Fish Fillets is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ranch Dressing or Crispy Battered Fish Fillets?

It depends on your goals. Ranch Dressing has 1390 calories, while Crispy Battered Fish Fillets has 223 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Ranch Dressing vegan?

No, Ranch Dressing is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ranch Dressing and Crispy Battered Fish Fillets?

There is a difference of 1167 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.