Head-to-Head Analysis

Real sugar soda vs Organic Lowfat Chocolate Milk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Real sugar soda

Real sugar soda

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Lowfat Chocolate Milk

Organic Lowfat Chocolate Milk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
42 kcal
Energy
54.2 kcal
11.3g
Sugars
8.3g
0g
Fat
1g
0g
Protein
3.3g
0g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Real sugar soda and Organic Lowfat Chocolate Milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Real sugar soda is the clear winner. With 12 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Real sugar soda contains significantly more sugar (11.27g) compared to the milder Organic Lowfat Chocolate Milk (8.33g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Lowfat Chocolate Milk is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Real sugar soda or Organic Lowfat Chocolate Milk?

It depends on your goals. Real sugar soda has 42 calories, while Organic Lowfat Chocolate Milk has 54.2 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Real sugar soda vegan?

No, Real sugar soda is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Real sugar soda and Organic Lowfat Chocolate Milk?

There is a difference of 12 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.