Head-to-Head Analysis

Red cabbage sweet sour vs Snacking Pickles - Cumin Lime Dill Pickle Spears

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Red cabbage sweet sour

Red cabbage sweet sour

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Snacking Pickles - Cumin Lime Dill Pickle Spears

Snacking Pickles - Cumin Lime Dill Pickle Spears

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
66.7 kcal
Energy
19.6 kcal
13.3g
Sugars
3.9g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
0.8g
Salt
2.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Red cabbage sweet sour and Snacking Pickles - Cumin Lime Dill Pickle Spears side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Red cabbage sweet sour is the more energy-dense option here, packing 47 more calories per 100g than Snacking Pickles - Cumin Lime Dill Pickle Spears. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Red cabbage sweet sour contains significantly more sugar (13.3333g) compared to the milder Snacking Pickles - Cumin Lime Dill Pickle Spears (3.921568627451g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Snacking Pickles - Cumin Lime Dill Pickle Spears is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Red cabbage sweet sour or Snacking Pickles - Cumin Lime Dill Pickle Spears?

It depends on your goals. Red cabbage sweet sour has 66.6667 calories, while Snacking Pickles - Cumin Lime Dill Pickle Spears has 19.607843137255 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Red cabbage sweet sour vegan?

No, Red cabbage sweet sour is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Red cabbage sweet sour and Snacking Pickles - Cumin Lime Dill Pickle Spears?

There is a difference of 47 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.