Reduced Fat 2% Milk vs Margarina
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Reduced Fat 2% Milk
Margarina
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Reduced Fat 2% Milk and Margarina side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Reduced Fat 2% Milk is the clear winner. With 20 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Reduced Fat 2% Milk contains significantly more sugar (5g) compared to the milder Margarina (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Margarina is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Reduced Fat 2% Milk offers a protein boost with 3.3333333333333g per 100g, outperforming Margarina in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Reduced Fat 2% Milk or Margarina?
It depends on your goals. Reduced Fat 2% Milk has 50 calories, while Margarina has 70 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Reduced Fat 2% Milk vegan?
No, Reduced Fat 2% Milk is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Reduced Fat 2% Milk and Margarina?
There is a difference of 20 calories per 100g between the two products.
