Head-to-Head Analysis

REDUCED FAT Jif CREAMY vs Polaner, basil, chopped, ready to use

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of REDUCED FAT Jif CREAMY

REDUCED FAT Jif CREAMY

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Polaner, basil, chopped, ready to use

Polaner, basil, chopped, ready to use

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
528 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
11.1g
Sugars
0g
33.3g
Fat
0g
19.4g
Protein
0g
1.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing REDUCED FAT Jif CREAMY and Polaner, basil, chopped, ready to use side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

REDUCED FAT Jif CREAMY is the more energy-dense option here, packing 528 more calories per 100g than Polaner, basil, chopped, ready to use. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. REDUCED FAT Jif CREAMY contains significantly more sugar (11.1g) compared to the milder Polaner, basil, chopped, ready to use (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Polaner, basil, chopped, ready to use is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? REDUCED FAT Jif CREAMY offers a protein boost with 19.4g per 100g, outperforming Polaner, basil, chopped, ready to use in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: REDUCED FAT Jif CREAMY or Polaner, basil, chopped, ready to use?

It depends on your goals. REDUCED FAT Jif CREAMY has 528 calories, while Polaner, basil, chopped, ready to use has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is REDUCED FAT Jif CREAMY vegan?

No, REDUCED FAT Jif CREAMY is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between REDUCED FAT Jif CREAMY and Polaner, basil, chopped, ready to use?

There is a difference of 528 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.