Reduced fat milk vs 1% Lowfat Milk UHT
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Reduced fat milk
1% Lowfat Milk UHT
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Reduced fat milk and 1% Lowfat Milk UHT side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Reduced fat milk is the more energy-dense option here, packing 76 more calories per 100g than 1% Lowfat Milk UHT. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Reduced fat milk contains significantly more sugar (11.8g) compared to the milder 1% Lowfat Milk UHT (5.08g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, 1% Lowfat Milk UHT is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Reduced fat milk offers a protein boost with 8.45g per 100g, outperforming 1% Lowfat Milk UHT in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Reduced fat milk or 1% Lowfat Milk UHT?
It depends on your goals. Reduced fat milk has 118 calories, while 1% Lowfat Milk UHT has 42.4 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Reduced fat milk vegan?
No, Reduced fat milk is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Reduced fat milk and 1% Lowfat Milk UHT?
There is a difference of 76 calories per 100g between the two products.
